Explanation: OK, how
many different species can you identify in the above image that covers only
about 40 square centimeters (6.2 square inches)? A dozen? Two
dozen? The shards of broken shells make it difficult to determine, and
some -- probably many -- species are likely buried out of sight below the
sand. Next,
how many individual organisms are present in this image? And
how many individual organisms are there, by species?
This is a lesson in metrics of biodiversity
-- various ways to measure the diversity of our biotic world -- such as
species richness (number of species), population density (total number of
individuals), and abundance distribution (numbers of individuals among
species). But
moreover, it is a lesson in the scaling of biodiversity. If
this tiny patch of wet sand -- here on the balmy beach of Puerto Peń
asco,
northwest Mexico -- can have so many species and individuals, then what does
that imply for even tinier scales, say the sub-macroscopic and the microscopic
scales of sand flies, sand fleas, bacteria, microalgae, and many other
inhabitants of this habitat?
And
what if you scale it up and ask the same questions about biodiversity metrics
at the macro scale, say, the entire shoreline? And
then what if you did all that, across all those spatial scales, but also
across all seasons, or across years, and added it all up?
The point here is that there is no
one single measure, and no one single scale, at which "biodiversity"
is measured. It is a dynamic feature of nature across various
measurements, and across sundry scales of space and time. And
at any scale, it can be wonderfully picturesque.
|